From Entertainment to Education: A Phenomenological Study of Students’ Self-Directed Learning Experiences with TikTok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58230/t4fh0k24Keywords:
self-directed learning, phenomenology, social media, micro-learning, TikTokAbstract
This study examines a common problem: adding digital technology to education does not always lead to real learning, a gap often called the “rich-technology, poor-pedagogy” phenomenon. Although students increasingly use social media platforms, most studies remain quantitative or focus on media development, and few capture how students themselves experience and make sense of these tools. This study aims to explore and describe in depth how senior high school students experience using TikTok as a self-directed learning resource. Using a qualitative phenomenological design based on Adrian van Kaam’s procedure, data were collected from eight purposively selected students at MAN 1 Yogyakarta through in-depth semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and documentation, with validity ensured through triangulation and member checking. The results show that students turn TikTok from an entertainment app into an effective tool for solving academic problems through short-video visualization. Learning is felt as enjoyable because of low academic pressure, relatable language, and easy access, in line with micro-learning. The study’s main contribution is a learner typology, comprising critical, pragmatic, and passive types, that links lived experience to the Technology Acceptance Model, showing that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use shape self-directed learning. The findings offer practical guidance for teachers to act as curators of valid digital content rather than as the sole source of knowledge.
Downloads
References
Aswan, D. (2023). Analisis pengaruh literasi digital terhadap kemandirian belajar mahasiswa dalam era internet. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 2023(20), 949–955. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10362490
Buzzetto-Hollywood, N., & Quinn, K. (2024). Technology behaviors of Generation Z learners. Journal of Education and Human Development, 13(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v13n1a6
Conde-Caballero, D., Castillo-Sarmiento, C. A., Ballesteros-Yánez, I., Rivero-Jiménez, B., & Mariano-Juárez, L. (2024). Microlearning through TikTok in higher education: An evaluation of uses and potentials. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2365–2385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11904-4
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Danish, J. A., Johnson, H., Nicholas, C., Cross Francis, D., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Park Rogers, M., Askew, R., Gerber, A., & Enyedy, N. (2021). Situating video as context for teacher learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100542
Davina Pebrimireni, & Diena San Fauziya. (2024). Analisis penggunaan aplikasi TikTok sebagai media pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dalam upaya peningkatan motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Bima, 2(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v2i3.1040
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Ding, N., Xu, X., & Lewis, E. (2023). Short instructional videos for the TikTok generation. Journal of Education for Business, 98(4), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2022.2103489
Elkatmış, M. (2024). Examination of social media usage habits of generation Z. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1370823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370823
Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M. M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548
Hu, Q., Hu, X., & Hou, P. (2022). One social media, distinct habitus: Generation Z’s social media uses and gratifications and the moderation effect of economic capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939128
Jin, S. H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Lim, Y., & Yu, S. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5
Kemal, F., Hikmat, A., & Safi’i, I. (2024). TikTok application as a media for learning Indonesian language in elementary schools. Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, 9(4), 913–917. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v9i4.1552
Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023: Global overview report. We Are Social & Meltwater.
Khlaif, Z. N., & Salha, S. (2021). Using TikTok in education: A form of micro-learning or nano-learning? Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 12(3), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2021.90211.1087
Khoiriah, W. I. N., Erliana, E., Koswara, I., Fuady, I., & Maitsi, H. N. (2023). Model motif penggunaan dan perilaku membagikan informasi dari aplikasi TikTok. Comdent: Communication Student Journal, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24198/comdent.v1i1.44808
Knowles, M. S. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Elsevier.
Liu, M., Vu, T. V., van Atteveldt, N., & Meeter, M. (2024). Testing the reciprocal effect between value of education, time investment, and academic achievement in a large non-Western sample. Journal of Intelligence, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110117
Meidina, A. P. (2025). TikTok as an alternative learning space: The phenomenon of live streaming learning. Komunikator, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.v17i2.28171
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.
Nguyen, H., & Diederich, M. (2023). Facilitating knowledge construction in informal learning: A study of TikTok scientific, educational videos. Computers & Education, 205, Article 104896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104896
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. W. W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Pratama Yendra, Y., Yuhardi, I., Wayudi, S., & Setiawan, A. (2024). Pemanfaatan media sosial aplikasi TikTok sebagai media edukasi di era generasi Z. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi, 1(4).
Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi pembelajaran abad 21 dan penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082
Sinfield, G., Goldspink, S., & Wilson, C. (2023). Waiting in the wings: The enactment of a descriptive phenomenology study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231207012
Thi Nguyet Trang, T., Chien Thang, P., Thi Truong Nguyen, G., & Thi Minh Nguyen, H. (2025). Factors driving Gen Z’s news engagement on TikTok: A hybrid analysis through CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100645
Van Kaam, A. (1959). Phenomenal analysis: Exemplified by a study of the experience of “really feeling understood.” Journal of Individual Psychology, 15(1), 66–72.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023). Teachers’ role in digitalizing education: an umbrella review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0

